We test how your firm appears across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Copilot, benchmark you against three named competitors, and tell you why the answer looks the way it does. Analysed by a person, back in about 48 hours, at no cost.
Interpretation rather than output. The value is in knowing why, because the why decides what you do about it.
Tested across five surfaces with the questions your buyers actually ask, not brand-name searches that any firm wins.
Whether it is crawler access, entity ambiguity, page structure, or that a third-party list is being cited instead of anybody's website. The reason determines the fix.
The same tests run against three named rivals from your market. This is the part no automated tool does, and usually the part that lands.
What to do first, what can wait, and what is not worth doing. Yours to act on with or without us.
These are not interchangeable. One study of 34,234 AI responses found only around 11% of domains are cited by both ChatGPT and Perplexity, so being visible on one tells you very little about the others.
5W AI Citation Index 2026, 34,234 AI responses
Instant checkers are a commodity now. Ahrefs runs one with no signup, and there are several others. They will tell you whether your brand came up. That is a useful thirty seconds and we would not try to compete with it.
What they cannot do is tell you why, or compare you against the three specific firms you actually lose work to. Those need someone to read the answers, look at what is being cited instead of you, and work out whether the problem is access, identity, structure or the fact that a directory is absorbing the citation entirely.
That is a person for a couple of hours, which is why it takes 48 hours rather than 30 seconds and why we run a limited number at a time.
Your firm and three named competitors we identify from your market, across all five surfaces, using the questions your buyers ask rather than your brand name.
Written by a person. If we are at capacity, we tell you that instead of leaving you waiting.
The fixes are yours. Act on them internally, hand them to whoever runs your site, or talk to us. There is no obligation attached and no sequence of emails.
Because something about their site makes them easier to cite. It may be crawler access, it may be that their firm resolves as a known entity and yours does not, or it may be that a third-party list names them and AI is drawing from that list rather than from anyone's website. The report tells you which.
A human read of why you are or are not cited, tested across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Gemini and Copilot, benchmarked against three named competitors. Plus the fixes, ranked by impact. Not a score out of 100 and not an automated printout.
Automated checkers tell you whether you were mentioned. They do not tell you why, and they cannot compare you against the specific rivals you actually lose deals to. Several run free with no signup, so there is no point competing with them on the check itself. The value here is the interpretation.
It is free, and there is no obligation attached. We use it to show a problem that is hard to see from the inside, on the reasonable expectation that some firms will want help fixing it. You get the report and a follow-up asking what you thought. No sequence, no list you have to escape.
Around 48 hours. It is analysed by a person rather than generated, so it is not instant, and we run a limited number at a time. If we are at capacity when you submit, you will hear that rather than being left waiting.
Four fields. About 48 hours. No cost.